Some films are so good and so iconic that any sequels that come after struggles to get out of the shadow of the original. This usually means that any sequels are tarred with a notion that they are inferior or just plain bad. In many cases, this is a fair assessment. However, there are examples of sequels that stand out as something special and should be revisited as excellent films in their own right. I should state, I’m not saying these films are superior to the originals, only that they are very good and should be reconsidered.
1. Exorcist 3: Legion (1990) – Exorcist 2 is a shambles. It’s incoherent and badly made. It was never going to damage the reputation of the original 1974 classic, but it looked like the end of the road for any possible future sequels. That was until the author of the original Novel, William Peter Blatty, wrote his own sequel novel, Legion. The book was a success and Blatty was given the green light to translate it to the screen.
The story is linked to the original through characters alone, leaving the demonic element behind. Detective Kinderman, who investigated the killing of a character in The Exorcist, is investigating a series of murders that are exactly the same as those committed by an executed serial killer from 15 years ago, The Gemini Killer.
As he digs, he finds links to Patient X being held in a local hospital. X has the face of Father Dyer, who had sacrificed his life to save Regan, the possessed girl from 73, but claims to be The Gemini killer.
As Patient X keeps ranting, people are still dying. Is the killer able to possess people and use them to commit new murders, or is Kinderman going mad?
Legion is a dark supernatural thriller with outstanding performances from George C. Scott as Kinderman and Brad Dourif as The Gemini Killer. The dialogue is snappy, pitted with humour and tension. It keeps an almost perfect balance of the two for most of the film, before pushing the viewer into full horror for the finale.
This is one of the best under-seen films ever, and I recommend it to everyone who would listen.
2. Psycho 2 (1983) – Hitchcock’s Psycho is pretty close to being a perfect movie. It was left alone for 23 years, but then a sequel came along and few knew what to make of it. In 1983, while people were aware of Psycho, I’m not sure many were clamouring for a follow up.
The risk with a Horror sequel, especially one linked to the birth of the slasher during the height of the slasher craze, would be to lean into the gore and have Norman fall back into his killer ways, stacking up the bodies. Luckily, Tom Holland didn’t go down this path. The film follows Norman after he is released and declared sane. He Returns home and tries to lead a quiet life with a job at a local diner while restoring the motel. However, he starts to receive notes and phone calls from his ‘Mother’. The Question is, is Norman crazy or is someone playing him?
The best part of this film is Anthony Perkins. His Norman Bates is a sympathetic victim who is desperately trying to get away from his past. Watching his fear and unravelling is truly tragic. The finale of the film provides a number of twists that keeps the viewer guessing. It is also directed and shot really well. Yes it does ape Hitchcock is several places, the shots could be considered homage or a maintaining of tone, but a couple are a little clumsy
Psycho 2 continues a story that you may not need to know, but is done so well that you will care about it and thrill in the horror.
3. Die Hard with a Vengeance (1995) – The first Die Hard changed the action genre. The 80’s were fuelled by muscle bound action stars, but Bruce Willis and Die Hard introduced the everyman action star back into the genre. He was a new kind of one-man army. So much so, that the pitch “Die Hard in a…” became a common phase.
By the third film in the series the it was the right choice to move away from the One-man army, to the buddy cop dynamic. It should also be noted that while Die Hard 1 and 2 were both based on novels, Die Hard 3 is actually a spec script. This is a script that was written (Called “Simon Says”) and then adjusted to fit the Die Hard series.
Die Hard 2 is a simple re-tread of the first film in tone and action, Vengeance however tries for something different. It introduces consequences for the events of the first film and provides a much bigger environment, as John McClane dashes around New York City. This puts the star back in his home turf and in his element.
It also puts him at odds with a partner in the shape of pitch perfect Samuel L Jackson as a citizen pulled into the action. It echoes elements of previous buddy movies but these two have such good chemistry that it feels fresh.
As well as the dynamic, the action is solid with different locations providing escalating incidents; from a gun fight in an elevator to a truck chase in a newly built tunnel, to a car chase through Central Park. This film is top notch, pulse pounding action delivered with a great cast and some spot on action visuals. While Die Hard is the best in the series, Vengeance is definitely the second best in the series.
4. Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – The original Blade Runner was a cinematic flop. It gradually became a cult hit, with each different version being released. So it’s no surprise that something similar happened with the sequel. Which is tragic as I think 2049 is one of the best sci-fi movies of the last 10 years; this is because of director Denis Villeneuve.
The film is visually stunning it expands on a world that is only hinted at in the first film. Its scope and depth is beautiful. The story is a continuation of the original world, providing more information without taking away any of the mystery or debate over certain areas. It’s one of the few sequels that builds on it without exploiting what has gone before.
In addition to looking great, the cast are spot on. Ryan Gosling has a similar noir air to him that Harrison Ford had in 1982. As he moves through the story and gets more and more of a beating, despite us knowing he’s a replicant, we want to see him succeed and live.
2049 is an example of how a sequel can pick up a baton 30 years later.
5. Rocky Balboa (2006) – The 1976 Rocky is an Oscar winning classic. It set up Stallone as a bankable star and able to take control of his career going forward. The first raft of sequels all offer something of note. I stand by the notion that the first three films form one of the best modern trilogies. Four is amazing pulp propaganda and 5 is an odd love letter to the characters origins. However, Stallone was not done with Rocky Balboa.
In recent years, everyone talks about the Original, or the spin off Creed films. However, the 2006 middle movie Rocky Balboa often is forgotten. ‘76 Rocky addresses the fear of missing your chance and becoming bitter, or taking an opportunity and going the distance. Rocky Balboa is about remaining relevant and how the past effects the present. It carries a sombre tone, noting everything that has passed since the last film. It asks the question of what happens when you’re over the hill? Could you still cut it with the new crop of stars? Rocky Balboa very much mirrors Stallone’s career at the time, wanting to remain a viable action star. It’s a relevant story of middle age and the changing face of Hollywood.
The cast are also solid and Stallone writes and directs the hell out of this. It has a hugely quotable script and the end match is incredibly well done. I remember when I saw this in the cinema for the first time. By the end of the film my heart was pounding and my fist was pumping. It echoes so much of the original and is a great end for the Rocky saga, before Creed starts.